Summary of Results
Stand:
6. How was the work in your group?6.1. Possibility to apply own knowledge and abilities
The highest score was given for possibility to apply own knowledge and
abilities. Reflections on this include: everyone was respected, we are more
confident now, everyone was granted the possibility to contribute, the group
work enabled us to apply and to make the most of our knowledge and personal
skills. Suggestions for improvement included support of a person experienced in
“learning through research”.
6.2. Co-operation in the group
All partner groups gave the highest marks to this question. In Vicenza the
co-operation was full and rewarding and increased during the duration of the
project), in Budejovice co-operation where everyone in the group worked on
his/her own task was seen as exemplary. Free choice of a group and possibility
of changing the group during the project was the wish for improvement in
Budejovice. In Granada, the group would wish for more solidarity amongst the
members of the group as at the end some members worked on their own and alone.
6.3.Conflict solving
A highest score from all partners to this question. Conflict solving was good
in all groups
6.4. Communication within the group
Again highest score was given to this question. Communication was frequent
and fluid and improved with time(Granada), no hindrances due to language
barriers on the group-basis (Vicenza).
6.5. Keeping to agreements
The answer “very good” predominates. Good atmosphere, the rules were based on
communication with each other (Budejovice) determined by the group. Lyon and
Vicenza report problems with keeping deadlines, this was solved by Vicenza
through introducing disciplinary measures in the group. Suggestion for
improvement from Granada: less directive from co-ordinators, more initiative
from the group.
6.6. Atmosphere
Atmosphere was generally very good, with willingness to help each other (Budejovice)
and great group solidarity and cohesion (Vicenza).
|
GemeinsamLernen
Page 7 of 11
Arnhem Group 
