_
  [ZAWiW] [gemeinsamlernen] [LiLL]
_ _ _
  Dreieck nach obenGemeinsamLernen  
_ _ _
  Dreieck nach obenSelf-organised Learning Groups in Europe
_ _
  Dreieck nach obenExperience Reports
_ _ _
    _Arnhem Group  
_ _ _ _
_
_ Page 1 of 10 >
_
_ home
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _ Doke Doude van Troostwijk
_ _
_ _ Hannie Pelleboer-Beuker
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _ A self-study-group in a non-universitary institute
_ _
_ Concluding Report
_ _
_ _
_ _

Concluding Report

Stand:


print print
What did the Arnhem self-study group learn from the SoLiLL-project.


Contents.
 
A. Local processes.     
    1. How did we get involved in the SoLiLL-project? 
    2. Preparation and recruitment. 
            2.1 Preparatory project-group. 
            2.2 Recruitment 
            2.3 Informative meetings.
    3. Data on participants.
    4. Initial processes of the thematic research. 
            4.1 A cycle of lectures as introduction. 
            4.2 Senior Citizens and Living, the theme framed. 
            4.3 The research divided into three elements. 
    5. The setting up of teams and the necessity of meetings with all participants. 
            5.1 Setting up a team. 
            5.2 Meetings with the entire group. 
            5.3 Other teams. 
            5.4. Is it possible to keep everyone posted? 
    6. A wide approach is desirable. 
            6.1 Drafting a research scheme and other training. 
            6.2 Attention to the transferring of information within a stratified organisation. 
    7. Some evaluation. 
    8. Other training. 
            8.1. ICT-training 
            8.2 When to organise the Homepage course? 
    9. Collective activities not directly having to do with the project. 
  10. A brief summary of the thematic research.
 
B. The international process.     
    1. The SoLiLL objectives. 
            1.1 The four major SoLiLL objectives. 
            1.2 Limited space for SoLiLL-objectives. 
    2. Tension between the SoLiLL-objectives and the basic conditions for the self-study group. 
            2.1 Pressure from the SoLiLL-programme. 
            2.2 The SoLiLL-project first and foremost a participants´ project. 
    3. A fundamental choice. 
    4. Some more evaluation. 
    5. Exchange benefits from personal contact. 
            6.1 The language barrier. 
            6.2 The collective thematic factor was non-existing. 
            6.3 Every solution requires a plan for implementation. 
            6.4 The programme should offer room for exchange.
 
C. Particulars.     
    1. Nomination International Prize in connection with the Week of Learning 2001. 
    2. Political consequences of the thematic research. 
        2.1. Political activities 1
        2.2. Political activities 2 
    3. Lecture on Senior Citizens and Living 

D. Final evaluation and conclusions.     
    1. Final evaluation. 
    2. Positive conclusions. 
    3. The end.