|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Result AnalysisStand:a) Which was the role of bread for the nutrition in the past?
The role of bread was more important at that time , as the part of bread in the total alimentation was high, it did not exist such a high variety of food. This was mentioned nearly by half of the inquired persons. A major part said that there were no differences between children and adults and between men and women. The following quotations saying the contrary, i.e. that there really were differences: A woman of 78 years from East Prussia: "During the
war the mothers gave their up-growing children a bigger portion of bread, they
themselves renounced of it. Later the father who had to work, obtained the
bigger part" "In the city you were relying on the food ration coupons". Regarding the difference between city and country, opinions are generally in common. The population in the countryside had always sufficient bread because of the availability of raw materials and the self-baking. The city population, however, went on "Hamstertour" (hoarding trip), scouring the countryside for food and giving as part payment valuables.
Summary The answers of the questioned persons are partly different
which proves that people did experience the lack of food and the rationing
differently or they have different remembrance to it. Most of the questioned
persons were towns-people who may have looked enviously at the self-providing
country people. Therefore for many of them the hoarding trips to the countryside
was the way-out.
|